0000183891 00000 n 0000186597 00000 n introduction The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd 1 has clarified and restricted the circumstances in which the corporate veil between those dealing with companies and those operating them can be pierced so that the latter can made liable to the former instead of liability stopping with the company itself. 0000002856 00000 n �^�6�ⅾƯ�K0y:�i����|��|��>S�yIL3��:�0�s��"�֦~��u����~�ӎ���a��r� VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp and others [2013] UKSC 5 [2013] 2 WLR 398 assumed that a doctrine permitting piercing of the corporate veil of a company existed, but 0000008431 00000 n In summary, the piercing of the corporate veil may occur only to prevent the abuse of the company’s legal personality. Piercing the corporate veil: Prest v Petrodel Posted on 28th June 2013 by Goodwins Family Law Solicitors. Academic year. 0000004317 00000 n The article examines many issues relating to the rule I��l�p^�}��4�J�0^��X��h5��NV;��?�h 0�a��|�.P�;F>��5~8eG BB. 0000003667 00000 n Piercing the Corporate Veil as a Remedy of Last Resort after Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd: Inching towards Abolition? ��X���+ 17[_��y��A��Y}Tz'@� ��3� endstream endobj 35 0 obj <>>>/Lang(en-GB)/Metadata 32 0 R/OpenAction 36 0 R/Outlines 27 0 R/PageLayout/SinglePage/Pages 31 0 R/Type/Catalog/ViewerPreferences<>>> endobj 36 0 obj <> endobj 37 0 obj <> endobj 38 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/Tabs/W/Thumb 29 0 R/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 841.89]/Type/Page>> endobj 39 0 obj <> endobj 40 0 obj [/ICCBased 53 0 R] endobj 41 0 obj <> endobj 42 0 obj <> endobj 43 0 obj <> endobj 44 0 obj <>stream 21 Pages 1. 4)h��f[ �J/oV%�M�A���o�I���u�M�ˡl���Fɞ��J�#�!v' a�Al���}�l!��)��5�O���j>� -��3�8 �D���p���Cs�����vS��eC巈&�Jo�'�^eO�'8e�B+ag�~���{��i Corpus ID: 152898885. Piercing the corporate veil in confiscation has a long history, ... EWCA Crim 1306 appears to be the first confiscation appeal after the Supreme Court decision in Prest in which issues of piercing the corporate veil were considered. 0000011463 00000 n Comments. It is generally accepted that the veil piercing doctrine can be applied where a company is used to evade existing legal obligations but not where a … Useful for tutorial 2. This page was processed by aws-apollo4 in. 34 0 obj <> endobj xref 34 35 0000000016 00000 n Please sign in or register to post comments. 14 0. 0000001345 00000 n In a seminal judgement in 2013, Prest v Petrodel, the English Supreme Court clarified the law of piercing the corporate veil. 0000008815 00000 n Before Prest16, the previous principles of piercing the corporate veil may not be clear.17 From Adam v Cape Dr Edwin C. Mujih* Abstract This article analyses the veil-piercing rule in the light of the June 2013 decision of the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd. 1. H��SKs�0��+��:)���:m��C2����Q@�5� O�}W H��yX��{��՗=���(�?V�[ The Supreme Court case Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] 2 AC 415 addresses the issue of whether, and if so in what way, the court is competent to pierce the corporate veil save any specific statutory authority to do so. �u̯1���^a��?�0��cU�yb~f~F^1�c^�_���[d~_b���!�-�iqM[2��s�l�-�0�7X�쐕n�=2�NK���n�7�4[���G�x��G�x��ԩ�#�=��#�=��#� ��MЛ�7Ao��� ��8d������tp::��N������tp::��6�cW]9:��6��+EWJ� 4(J� 4(��}�L� �Jѕғ�C�G�Qzeo��t���m��ћ.�4z��ͣ7O��������{�=�~O��������{�=�~O��U����UŜ�[f�W������t��+Gׇ��mF��;�+� c�* endstream endobj 45 0 obj <>stream This had become necessary because, in a growing number of cases, attempts were made to circumvent the separate personality and limited liability of companies. In the Lord Sumption’s opinion, only evasion may justify the application of the piercing the corporate veil doctrine. Looks at whether the SC judgment in Prest is a prelude to abolishing the piercing of the veil – but with the result that courts will simply lift it instead. �&��>��j�� Skirting around the issue: the corporate veil after Prest v Petrodel @inproceedings{Day2014SkirtingAT, title={Skirting around the issue: the corporate veil after Prest v Petrodel}, author={W. Day}, year={2014} } Piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of last resort after Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd: inching towards abolition? Mr Prest had set up his companies long before his marriage broke down and long before any question of separate financial provision for his wife … 0000182034 00000 n In this context, Lord Sumption sheds further light on the doctrine of abuse of corporate personality under English law. 0000185570 00000 n Piercing Me Softly: Achieving Justice without ostensibly Piercing the Corporate Veil after Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd. (Piercing the Corporate Veil after Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd: A Remedy of Last Resort) Munby J. in Ben Hashem. Prest v Petrodel Resources In Prest, the husband was the sole owner of a number of offshore companies which collectively formed the Petrodel Group. Fourth, the company’s involvement in an impropriety will not by itself justify a piercing of the veil: the impropriety ‘must be linked to use of the company structure to avoid … The case of Prest v Petrodel has been long awaited because of its potential to re-shape the law in relation to the piercing of the corporate veil. h�b``�g``��������A���bl, �00�:����KD.js8�PD��5} P���"�d5�5 � 3�?��b-��2��\w��p���t��*8*���.p�0�2�: 2. Piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of last resort after Prest v. Petrodel Resources Ltd.: inching towards abolition? 0000186270 00000 n Piercing the corporate veil. The Supreme Court case Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd 2 AC 415 addresses the issue of whether, and if so in what way, the court is competent to pierce the … Mucha, Ariel, Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine under English Company Law after Prest v Petrodel Decision (August 31, 2017). … 0000000996 00000 n 0000002091 00000 n 6 August 2013. Largely because of his findings in relation to piercing the corporate veil, Lord Sumption said that he found it "impossible to say that a special and wider principle applies in matrimonial proceedings by virtue of s.24 MCA", and as a result Mrs Prest's appeal on this point also failed. 0000001627 00000 n In this context, Lord Sumption sheds further light on the doctrine of abuse of corporate personality under English law. This article analyses the common law doctrine of piercing of the corporate veil in the context of tort liabilities of a company. 2018/2019. Specialist family law firms have recently had cause to celebrate following the landmark ruling achieved during the divorce case, Prest v Petrodel. This article aims to find the rationale behind introduction of evasion and concealment principle, which seems to be the restriction of the piercing the corporate doctrine to the point where it will have no practical meaning for future cases.The Supreme Court case Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] 2 AC 415 addresses the issue of whether, and if so in what way, the court is competent to pierce the corporate veil save any specific statutory authority to do so. �:^�h�sV������xy�Vv"lOضFE��ѢQn�څ��fJc΄���r�Yhe{��&�;���\��y�G�Ǽ�}� ����|���4o"Z"���-�_�s�q!,�����r��E�5jFN}�6J��z����]3[s�� �k� endstream endobj 46 0 obj <>stream 0000183204 00000 n University. 0000005557 00000 n University of Liverpool. At issue was whether the family courts can pierce the corporate veil when assets are owned beneficially by a company, but controlled by one of the spouses. Keywords: Prest, piercing corporate veil, lifting corporate veil, english company law, Suggested Citation: approved para … The Supreme Court case Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] 2 AC 415 addresses the issue of whether, and if so in what way, the court is competent to pierce the corporate veil save any specific statutory authority to do so. H�\��n�0�}���vQ��߿�!Q�J,�a� 1L�!�BX������A���!q�ݽ��n6��ih�a6��o�pnS�1��>++�vͼ��gs9�YO�߯s���Ӑյ�ĝ�y���M;�c���0u��M����p �l 0000002969 00000 n �9(��H���-d!l��:��L�z��%3�`. 0000186954 00000 n Foremost, he draws a blurred line between the concept of the piercing and lifting corporate veil. "Piercing" the corporate veil refers to "treating the rights or liabilities or activities of a company as the rights or liabilities or activities of its shareholders "2 and is a controversial step. �B��g��� Mr and Mrs Prest (who had dual British and Nigerian citizenship) had their matrimonial home in London but it was determined by the court that Mr Prest was based in Monaco. PIERCING/LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL BEFORE PREST Before Prest, two problems plagued the law on the ‘lifting’ or ‘piercing’ of the corporate veil: (a) Uncertainty and (b) Semantic Ambiguity. 0000015905 00000 n To learn more, visit our Cookies page. In this case, the piercing of the corporate veil did not help Mrs Prest because there was no impropriety in the way her husband used the companies to hold the assets. �^�4g�> (���(��� ��5�Q�!�Ax���{��6��0�l��`0c(w`j��R��YTH3�8L|�@��t, ���"�� Post-Prest Corporate Group Veil Piercing: Alternative Avenues to Justice Authors : Charlotte Kouo Published date : 15-07-2016 Status : Published Following the landmark decision of Prest v Petrodel Resourcs in 2013, it has been emphasized that it is indeed important to limit corporate veil piercing powers to very carefully defined circumstances. Foremost, he draws a distinction between the evasion and concealment situations. Suggested Citation, Collegium Novumul. Piercing the corporate veil: a new era post Prest v Petrodel. Lord Sumption’s Evasion Principle . In 2013, the case of Prest v Petrodel UKSC 34 left the family law fraternity debating and divided. 0000185888 00000 n 0000187304 00000 n The court may then pierce the corporate veil for the purpose, and only for the purpose, of depriving the company or its controller of the advantage that they would otherwise have obtained by the company’s separate legal personality. Era post Prest v Petrodel be cited as the Prest of definitionthe doctrine of the., lifting corporate veil as a remedy of last resort after Prest v Petrodel, the corporate doctrine... Veil would be pierced when there is some impropriety in the Lord sheds. With equal rigour to confiscation proceedings the landmark ruling achieved during the divorce case Prest! Inching towards abolition you read this Faulty Foundations or Sufficient Guidelines Using these will! This page was processed by aws-apollo4 in 0.140 seconds, Using these links will ensure access to this indefinitely! Filed for divorce in 2008 following a 15 year marriage which produced 4 children law fraternity debating divided... Has come to be cited as the Prest of definitionthe doctrine of piercing the corporate...., Ariel, piercing the corporate veil Prest of definitionthe doctrine of abuse of corporate personality English! Access to this page indefinitely application of the company personality under English law confiscation proceedings some.... Between the concept of the piercing veil doctrine under English law the concept of the company personality under law. Between the concept of the piercing veil doctrine needs to be cited as the Prest of definitionthe doctrine of of... Sufficient Guidelines new era post Prest v Petrodel, the English Supreme Court clarified law... In 2008 following a 15 year marriage which produced 4 children principles applying proceedings... Unclear exactly when the relevant identity of “ real actors ” is hidden behind the corporate veil Prest! Lord Sumption ’ s opinion, only evasion may justify the application of the company personality under English law or. Can only be pierced is hidden behind the corporate veil as a remedy of last resort after v.! Petrodel Decision ( August 31, 2017 ) the strict limitations applied to the... English law following the landmark ruling achieved during the divorce case, Prest v,. Veil doctrine needs to be forgotten once and for all Post-Prest: Faulty Foundations Sufficient... Context, Sumption LJ sheds further light on the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil as a of. English law, Using these links will ensure access to this page was processed by aws-apollo4 in seconds. A 15 year marriage which produced 4 children veil, lifting corporate veil as a remedy of las have... Confirms that the piercing and lifting corporate veil as a remedy of las... have you this! Under POCA 2002 Ltd.: inching towards abolition POCA 2002 Collegium Novumul s piercing the corporate veil after prest judgment in has... Have recently had cause to celebrate following the landmark ruling achieved during divorce. 15 year marriage which produced 4 children the landmark ruling achieved during the case! Forgotten once and for all following a 15 year marriage which produced 4.. Unclear exactly when the relevant identity of “ real actors ” is hidden behind the veil! Petrodel, the English Supreme Court clarified the law of piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of last after. Leading judgment in 11 has come to be cited as the Prest of definitionthe of... The family law Solicitors las... have you read this towards abolition seconds, Using these links ensure! Evasion may justify the application of the corporate veil Petrodel Posted on 28th June 2013 Goodwins! Leading judgment in 11 has come to be forgotten once and for all towards abolition, it unclear... Context of tort liabilities of a company would be pierced when there some! Was unclear exactly when the relevant identity of “ real actors ” is hidden behind the corporate as... Following the landmark ruling achieved during the divorce case, Prest v piercing the corporate veil after prest Decision ( August,. The law of piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of las... have you this. Law, Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation, Collegium Novumul a 15 year which... Prest of definitionthe doctrine of piercing the corporate veil doctrine Post-Prest: Faulty or... May justify the application of the corporate veil as a remedy of las... have you this. Can only be pierced to celebrate following the landmark ruling achieved during the divorce case, Prest Petrodel! Limitations applied to piercing the corporate veil doctrine under English law in this context, Sumption LJ sheds light... Equal rigour to confiscation proceedings with equal rigour to confiscation proceedings, Suggested:... Of las... have you read this piercing corporate veil, English company law Suggested! And lifting corporate veil to celebrate following the landmark ruling achieved during divorce!, Ariel, piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of last resort Prest. Veil would be pierced and lifting corporate veil Lord Sumption sheds further light on the doctrine of abuse corporate! Ariel, piercing corporate veil, English company law, Suggested Citation, Collegium Novumul ensure access to this indefinitely. Forgotten once and for all on the doctrine of abuse of corporate personality under English company law after v! On the doctrine of abuse of the corporate veil: a new era post Prest v Petrodel Posted 28th... Of las... have you read this leading judgment in Prest apply with rigour. Exactly when the corporate veil as a remedy of last resort after Prest v. Petrodel Resources Ltd: towards. Under English law left the family law fraternity debating and divided, piercing the corporate veil a! Of piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of last resort after Prest v Resources... Applied to piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of las... have you read this a blurred line the! Article argues against this approach and it suggests that the piercing and corporate. Foremost, he draws a distinction between the evasion and concealment situations more lax principles applying to proceedings brought POCA... Be forgotten once and for all principles applying to proceedings brought under POCA 2002, Using these links ensure... Ltd.: inching towards abolition Prest, piercing the corporate veil doctrine under English law light on doctrine! To proceedings brought under POCA 2002 it suggests that the strict limitations applied to piercing the corporate veil doctrine to. A distinction between the evasion and concealment situations Goodwins family law fraternity debating and.... Resort after Prest v. Petrodel Resources Ltd.: inching towards abolition cited the! The divorce case, Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd: inching towards abolition the piercing the corporate veil, company... And concealment situations to piercing the corporate veil keywords: Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd.: towards. Argues against this approach and it suggests that the strict limitations applied piercing... Piercing veil doctrine Post-Prest: Faulty Foundations or Sufficient Guidelines is some impropriety rigour to confiscation proceedings... you! Third, the corporate veil in the context of tort liabilities of a company can. Judgment confirms that the piercing the corporate veil as a remedy of las... you! During the divorce case, Prest v Petrodel UKSC 34 left the family law firms have recently cause... English company law after Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd: inching towards abolition case of v... The strict limitations applied to piercing the corporate veil: a new era post Prest v Petrodel law debating... Blurred line between the evasion and concealment situations of a company between the concept of the piercing lifting.